Journal of Emergency Health Care
Formerly known as: International Journal of Medical Investigation
Volume 4, Issue 3 (September 2015)
J Emerg Health Care 2015, 4(3): 333-337 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Jalilian A, Valizadeh R, Rashidbeygi M, Mohammed Hassan Nahal M, Shafieian M, Marzban R et al . Predictive factors of hysterectomy in the City of Ilam: The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve model approach.. J Emerg Health Care 2015; 4 (3) :333-337
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-170-en.html
URL: http://intjmi.com/article-1-170-en.html
Anahita Jalilian 
, Reza Valizadeh , Milad Rashidbeygi , Monireh Mohammed Hassan Nahal , Mahnaz Shafieian , Reza Marzban , Kourosh Sayehmiri *
, Reza Valizadeh , Milad Rashidbeygi , Monireh Mohammed Hassan Nahal , Mahnaz Shafieian , Reza Marzban , Kourosh Sayehmiri *
Assistant Professor of Biostatistics, Center for prevention of psychosocial trauma, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
Abstract: (10372 Views)
Abstract Background: Hysterectomy pertains tothe removal of the uterus and the cervix without removal of adenexes. Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures and in the United States it ranks as the second common operation after cesarean. The objective of this study is to investigate the related variables involved among women with hysterectomy in the Shahid Mustafa Khomeini hospital inthe city of Ilam, Iran. Methods: A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 150 women including 75 in the control group and 75 as the case group. The cases were women with hysterectomy during 2009-2011, and the control group was randomly selected out of women referred to the hospital in these years and hospitalized due to other causes other than hysterectomy.Data were analyzed using SPSS software, version 17. T-test and Chi-square test were used as appropriated.Precision the prediction models evaluated using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: In this study, of the all operations (2009-2011) performed on women in the Shahid Mustafa Khomeini hospital in Ilam, 76 women (3.8%) had undergone hysterectomy.The mean age of women with hysterectomy and the control group were 48.2 and 28.8 respectively. The mean numbers of pregnancies forthe control group as well as women with hysterectomy were 2.18% and 6.33%, respectively. The most common cause of hysterectomy was abnormal uterine bleeding (52%). There was a significant relationship between age and the risk of hysterectomy (P < 0.001). Considering the pelvic mass, 4 (5.3 %)of the cases and 33 individuals (44%) who had a history of hysterectomy had such a mass (P < 0.001, OR = 13.94). Conclusion: As revealed in this study, hysterectomy in most cases is performed aboutthe menopause age when the incidence of abnormal uterine bleeding is relatively common. Thus, it might be possible to treat the patient with maintenance therapy in order to reduce the prevalence of hysterectomy.
References
1. 1 –Roch JA, Jones HW. Tlindesoperatire Gynecology, 9 th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2005; 799 - 845.
2 – Katherine G, Dragisic, Magdy P. Sexual functioning and patient expectations of sexual functioning after hysterectomy. Am J ob and Gyn 2004;190 (5): 1416 - 1418.
3 - Nezhat C, nezhat F, luciano A, siegler A, Metzger D, Nezhat CH. operatire Gynecologic laparoscopy principles and Techniques. New York: McGraw-Hill 1995.
4 – Jonathan SB. Novak's Gynecology. 3th ed. Lippinincott Williams & Wilkins co;2001; 590.
5 – Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990-1997. J Obstes Gynecol 2002; 99 (2); 229-34.
6 –Pokars R, Hufnagel VG. Hystere in the United States, 1965-1984. AGPH 2005; 852-853.
7 – Dickinson JA, Hill AM. The incidence of hysterectomy and its effect on the probability of developing uterine censers. Common Health Stud 1998; 12: 176.
8 – Hass S, Acker D. Variation in hysterectomy rates across small geographic areas of Massachusetts. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;150-169.
9 – Davis A. Indications and alternative to hysterectomy. Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 11: 61-75.
10 –Gholipour A. A study on causes of hysterectomy considering the sand and pathology of the patients in Imam Hussein hospital in Tehran from 1989-1990. Doctor of Medicine Thesis. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 1991.
11 –Rittaluto R. Incidence causes and surgical methods for hysterectomy in Finland 1987-1989. Int J Epidemiol 1994; 23: 384-353.
12–Behrashy M. On the prevalence of hysterectomy in patients referred to Dr. Shabihkhani hospital in the city of Kashan during 1995-1996. The Faiz Journal 1999.
13 – Jones HW. Novak's textbook of gynecology. 12th ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins 1996; 405-438.
14 – Rock JA, Thompson JD. Telinde's operative gynecology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 1997; 771 - 780.
15 - Berek JS, Adashi EY, Hillard PA. Novak's Gynecology, 12th ed. Baltimore: Willims& Wilkins 1996; 727-67.
16 –Roch JA. Jones HW. Telindes Operative Gynecology, 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2005; 799-845.
17 - Al-Nuam LA, Esset J, Banu F, Chowdhury N. An appraisal of the appropriateness of the indications for hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynaecol 1997; 17 (5): 461-4.
18 –Torabzadeh A. Hysterectomy causes, pathological findings and postoperative complications during two years in the Medical Center of Ghaem in Mashhad, Journal of Medical University of Mashhad 1998;58:56-59.
19 –Shergill SK, Shergill HK, Gupta M, Kaur S. Clinico pathological study of Hysterectomies. J Indian Med Assoc 2002; 100 (4): 238-9.
20 –Rahimi G. Evaluation of indications and methods of hysterectomy in the educational medical center of Alavi in Ardebil during 2000-2001, Journal of Ardabil University of Medical Sciences 2005; 5(1):59-64.
21 – Nadei T. A comparison of the performance of outpatient endometrial biopsy, dilatation, cortege, and hysterectomy in diagnosis of endometrial lesions. Journal of Kerman University of Medical Sciences 2005;13(3):163-159.
22-Holly H. Age specific hysterectomy and ophorectomy prevalence rates and the risk for cancer of reproductive system. Am j public Health 1984; 11:560-563.
23-Weaver F, Hynes D, Goldberg JM, Khuri S, et al. Hysterectomy in Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. J Obstet Gynecol 2001;97 (6):880-4.
24-Broder MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations for hysterectomy. J Obstet Gynecol 2000; 95 (2) :199-205.
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |